FE section 12 of 16 · free theory
Geotechnical Engineering
Everything soil: classification, phase relations, effective stress, seepage, consolidation, shear strength, earth pressure, bearing capacity, and slope stability — the full FE Civil geotechnical syllabus with worked examples.
Take the free 5-question mini-quiz ↓
Soil as a three-phase material
Soil is solids, water, and air. Nearly every geotechnical calculation starts by sorting out how much of each you have — get fluent with these and the rest of the section falls into place:
n = e / (1 + e) S = w Gs / e
| e | void ratio = Vv/Vs |
| n | porosity = Vv/V |
| S | degree of saturation = Vw/Vv (0 to 1) |
| w | water content = Ww/Ws |
| Gs | specific gravity of solids (usually 2.65–2.75) |
γd = Gsγw / (1 + e) γsat = (Gs + e)γw / (1 + e) γ = γd(1 + w)
| γw | unit weight of water: 9.81 kN/m³ (62.4 pcf) |
Sanity checks that catch arithmetic slips: S can never exceed 100%, e and n move together, and γd < γ < γsat for a partially saturated soil. S = 1 marks full saturation, S = 0 marks perfectly dry soil.
Soil classification
Classification turns a gradation curve and a couple of Atterberg tests into a two-letter symbol — and on the exam, into a decision about drainage, strength, and compressibility:
PI = LL − PL LI = (w − PL) / PI
| LL, PL | liquid limit and plastic limit (Atterberg limits) |
| PI | plasticity index — the range of water contents where the soil behaves plastically |
| LI | liquidity index — LI < 0: stiff; 0–1: plastic; > 1: liquid |
Cu = D60/D10 Cc = D30² / (D10 D60)
| D10, D30, D60 | grain diameters at 10, 30, 60% finer by weight |
USCS in one pass: more than 50% retained on the No. 200 sieve → coarse-grained (G gravel / S sand); second letter W (well-graded), P (poorly), M (silty), C (clayey). Otherwise fine-grained (M silt / C clay / O organic / Pt peat), placed by LL and PI against the A-line, PI = 0.73(LL − 20). Well-graded sand needs Cu ≥ 6 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3 (gravel: Cu ≥ 4). AASHTO (highway soils) runs A-1 (best) to A-8 (organic, worst) with a group index that grows as fines, LL, and PI grow.
Compaction
Compaction squeezes air out of the voids. The lab Proctor test finds the water content that gives the densest packing; the field crew then has to reproduce it:
RC = γd,field / γd,max (lab)
| RC | relative compaction — specifications commonly require ≥ 95% |
γzav = Gsγw / (1 + w Gs)
| γzav | zero-air-voids unit weight — the theoretical ceiling at water content w |
The compaction curve peaks at the optimum moisture content: dry of optimum the soil is stiff and hard to compact; wet of optimum the water starts carrying the compactive effort. A measured field density that plots above the zero-air-voids curve is impossible — recheck the numbers.
Effective stress
The single most-tested idea in the section: soil grains feel only the stress carried through grain contacts — total stress minus pore water pressure:
σ′ = σ − u
| σ | total vertical stress = Σ(γ · thickness) of everything above |
| u | pore water pressure = γw × depth below the water table (hydrostatic) |
| σ′ | effective stress — this is what controls strength and settlement |
ic = γsub / γw = (Gs − 1) / (1 + e)
| ic | critical hydraulic gradient — upward seepage at ic drops σ′ to zero (quick condition) |
Seepage shifts effective stress: downward flow adds seepage force and increases σ′; upward flow subtracts it. At the quick condition the sand boils and bearing capacity vanishes — check FS = ic/i on any upward-seepage question.
Seepage and Darcy's law
Water flows through soil in proportion to the hydraulic gradient. Permeability k spans ten orders of magnitude from gravel to clay — always check that the k you are given suits the soil you are analysing:
q = k i A v = k i vs = v / n
| q | discharge through area A perpendicular to flow |
| v | discharge (Darcy) velocity — a flux, not the speed of a water particle |
| vs | seepage velocity — the actual travel speed through the pores |
| i | hydraulic gradient = head loss / flow-path length |
q = k h (Nf / Nd) per unit length of structure
| Nf, Nd | number of flow channels and equipotential drops in the flow net |
Flow-net rules worth memorising: flow lines and equipotentials cross at right angles, each “square” is a curvilinear square, and head drops by h/Nd across each equipotential band. Uplift under a dam comes from the pore pressure at the base of the structure, read off the net.
Consolidation settlement
Clays settle slowly as pore water squeezes out. The exam wants the magnitude of primary settlement — and sometimes how long it takes:
sc = H01 + e0 Cc log10σ′v0 + Δσσ′v0
| sc | primary consolidation settlement (normally consolidated clay) |
| H0, e0 | initial layer thickness and void ratio |
| Cc | compression index (use Cr, the recompression index, for stress stays below the preconsolidation pressure σ′p) |
| σ′v0, Δσ | initial vertical effective stress and the added stress, both at mid-layer |
Tv = cv t / Hdr²
| Tv | time factor — U = 50% consolidation at Tv = 0.197 |
| Hdr | drainage path: H/2 for double drainage, H for single |
The log is base 10 — the classic trap is reaching for ln. Overconsolidated clays (OCR = σ′p/σ′v0 > 1) settle far less while stresses stay below σ′p, because Cr is a small fraction of Cc.
Shear strength
Soil fails in shear along a plane, and the Mohr–Coulomb rule describes the envelope it fails on. Note what the equation is written in: effective stress:
τ = c + σ′ tan φ
| τ | shear strength on the failure plane |
| c | cohesion intercept |
| φ | friction angle |
su = qu / 2
| su | undrained shear strength from an unconfined compression test (UU: φ = 0, τ = su) |
Test types: UU (unconsolidated-undrained) → total-stress, φ = 0 for saturated clay; CU (consolidated-undrained) → gives both total and effective parameters; CD (consolidated-drained) → slow enough that u = 0, so c′, φ′ directly. Match the parameters to the drainage conditions of the problem.
Lateral earth pressure
Retaining walls feel horizontal stress that is a fraction K of the vertical effective stress. Three K values, one ordering to remember: Ka < K0 < Kp:
K0 = 1 − sin φ Ka = 1 − sin φ1 + sin φ = tan²(45° − φ/2) Kp = 1/Ka = tan²(45° + φ/2)
| K0 | at-rest — wall does not move (normally consolidated soil) |
| Ka | active — wall moves away, soil reaches failure stretching outward |
| Kp | passive — wall pushes into the soil (much larger resistance) |
σ′h = K σ′v
φ goes into the tan² formula in degrees — a calculator in radian mode silently gives a wrong K. Compute the water pressure separately and add it to the effective lateral stress; water has no K.
Bearing capacity
Terzaghi's equation adds three contributions: the soil's cohesion, the surcharge of soil above the footing base, and the weight of the soil below it:
qult = sc c Nc + γDfNq + sγ ½ γB Nγ qall = qult / FS
| Nc, Nq, Nγ | bearing-capacity factors — functions of φ only (from the reference tables) |
| sc, sγ | shape factors: strip 1.0/1.0, square 1.3/0.8, circular 1.3/0.6 |
| Df, B | embedment depth and footing width |
Use the submerged unit weight γ′ for soil below the water table in the third term. Net ultimate capacity subtracts the overburden: qnet = qult − γDf. Try the bearing capacity calculator to check your hand work.
Slope stability
The factor of safety is always resisting forces over driving forces. For a long slope in cohesionless or cohesive soil, the infinite-slope model gives a closed form:
FS = c + γz cos²β tan φγz sin β cos β
| FS | factor of safety — below 1.0 the slope fails; design commonly targets ≥ 1.5 |
| z | depth to the slip plane, β the slope angle |
Seepage parallel to the slope is the usual exam twist: it adds a seepage force down the slope, so replace γ with the submerged weight and add the flow force — FS drops. For general slip surfaces the exam expects the concept of slices (method of slices: moment equilibrium about the circle centre), not a full slice table by hand.
Worked example Phase relations from a lab sample
Given:
- Specific gravity of solids Gs = 2.68.
- Water content w = 22%.
- Void ratio e = 0.71.
Solution:
- Porosity: n = e/(1 + e) = 0.71/1.71 = 0.415 (41.5%).
- Degree of saturation: S = w Gs/e = 0.22 × 2.68 / 0.71 = 0.830 → 83.0%.
- Dry unit weight: γd = Gsγw/(1 + e) = 2.68 × 9.81 / 1.71 = 15.4 kN/m³.
- Saturated unit weight: γsat = (Gs + e)γw/(1 + e) = 3.39 × 9.81 / 1.71 = 19.4 kN/m³.
- Cross-check via the moist weight: γ = γd(1 + w) = 15.4 × 1.22 = 18.8 kN/m³, which matches (Gs + S e)γw/(1 + e) — the numbers are consistent.
Answer: S ≈ 83.0%, γd ≈ 15.4 kN/m³, γsat ≈ 19.4 kN/m³.
Worked example Effective stress under upward seepage
Given:
- 5.0 m sand layer, water table at the ground surface.
- Saturated unit weight γsat = 19.6 kN/m³.
- Upward seepage with hydraulic gradient i = 0.30.
Solution:
- Submerged unit weight: γsub = 19.6 − 9.81 = 9.79 kN/m³.
- Without seepage, σ′ at 5.0 m = 5.0 × 9.79 = 49.0 kPa.
- Upward seepage subtracts i γw per metre: σ′ = (γsub − i γw) z = (9.79 − 0.30 × 9.81) × 5.0 = 6.85 × 5.0 = 34.2 kPa.
- Quick-condition check: ic = γsub/γw = 9.79/9.81 = 0.998; FS = ic/i = 0.998/0.30 = 3.3 — safe against boiling.
Answer: σ′ ≈ 34.2 kPa at the base; FS against the quick condition ≈ 3.3.
Worked example Terzaghi bearing capacity of a square footing
Given:
- Square footing, B = 1.5 m, embedment Df = 0.8 m.
- Clean sand: c = 0, φ = 30°, γ = 17 kN/m³.
- Bearing factors for φ = 30°: Nc = 37.2, Nq = 22.5, Nγ = 19.7.
Solution:
- Square shape factors: sc = 1.3, sγ = 0.8.
- Cohesion term: 1.3 × 0 × 37.2 = 0.
- Surcharge term: γDfNq = 17 × 0.8 × 22.5 = 306 kPa.
- Self-weight term: 0.8 × ½ × 17 × 1.5 × 19.7 = 200.9 kPa.
- qult = 306 + 200.9 = 506.9 ≈ 507 kPa; with FS = 3, qall = 507/3 ≈ 169 kPa.
Answer: qult ≈ 507 kPa, qall ≈ 169 kPa at FS = 3.